Competitive Landscape

Compared to other licensed layer-1s, Colisto’s protocol performance lags behind. Nasdaq-listed Solana outperforms Colisto in TPS (65k vs 27k) and latency (400ms vs 1100ms), while Ethereum, despite its lower TPS (15-45), offers significantly faster finality (13s vs 36s).

Value Proposition

Colisto’s focus on privacy and compliance comes at a performance cost. Its shielded transactions require additional processing rounds, resulting in slower throughput compared to competitors like Zcash and Monero. While Colisto provides enterprise-grade security, maintaining a scalable and performant network remains a challenge.

Market Adoption

Despite its lower performance, Colisto’s unique regulatory compliance and privacy features have gained traction in certain sectors. Financial institutions and regulated entities value its strict adherence to AML/KYC standards and the ability to shield sensitive transactions. However, widespread adoption requires striking a balance between security, privacy, and overall performance.